Saturday, July 19, 2014

Palestine and Israel: A Pastor's Reflections

The news the last couple of weeks has been littered with accounts of what is going on in the Middle East.  It appears to be the same story that has played itself out many times in recent decades – Israel feels provoked by Palestinians living in the West Bank or in Gaza and, seeking to defend itself, launches retaliatory attacks.  Unfortunately, this is neither a new nor an infrequent tale.  As a pastor, I find myself increasingly troubled by these events and wondering what my response as a follower of Jesus Christ should be.  How can I faithfully seek God's Kingdom in the midst of this conflict?

The fact of the matter is that the events in Israel and Palestine present a special problem for Christians.  There is, it seems, a greater tension within Christianity about these issues than about many others.  My belief is that much of this tension derives from assumptions we have made about the Bible, about theology, and about both the Israeli population and the Palestinian population.  At the root of these assumptions is the concept of Christian Zionism.

Popular in many conservative denominations, Christian Zionism is loosely defined as the belief that Christians in the 21st Century have a moral and biblical obligation to support Israel in every circumstance.  Israel is seen as God’s Land and its people as God’s People.  To fail to support Israel, then, is to betray God.

Added to Christian Zionism are assumptions made by well-meaning Christians about the Palestinian people.  As one friend commented on Facebook recently, the Palestinians are “infidels” (another word for Muslim, it seems) who want to “wipe Israel off the map.”  When set in these terms, it is not difficult to arrive at the conclusion that Israel is indeed God’s chosen nation.

What if I told you, though, that those assumptions might not be correct?  Or that, at the very least, that they fail to tell the whole story?  What if I told you that, while it is true that a significant majority (somewhere between 80 and 85 percent) of Palestinians are Muslim, there are in the West Bank and Gaza somewhere around 85,000 Palestinian Christians and 500,000 Palestinian Jews?  It is not so easy to dismiss our fellow brothers and sisters in Christ as “infidels” hell bent on Israel’s destruction, is it?

More insidious than the assumptions we make about the Palestinian people is the idea put forth by Christian Zionists that Christians have no choice but to support Israel.  The remainder of this post is intended to demonstrate that, though a case might be made for supporting Israel in everything it does, the Bible does not demand such support and might even caution against such support.  We’ll begin with a look at the Bible itself.

The Nation-State of Israel and the Bible

Right off the bat, I have to be clear about one thing: the nation-state of Israel is never mentioned in the Bible.  Not once.  Never.  In any book.  In fact, the very idea of a nation-state is foreign to the Bible.  When the Bible uses terms like “nation,” it is more helpful to think in terms of the First Peoples of the Americas (i.e. the Navajo “Nation” or the Cheyenne “Nation”) than to think in terms of today’s nation-state.  The age of the idea of the nation-state is disputed by scholars, but it seems safe to say that the modern nation-state did not come into existence until at least 1400-1600 years after Christ lived, died, was resurrected, and ascended.  If you want to get more specific with the modern nation of Israel, it post-dates Jesus by more than 1900 years, having only been around since November 29, 1947. 

The Bible does not speak about the modern nation-state of Israel.  The Bible does, however, speak about the people of God.  In fact, in the book of Ezekiel, God says this: “I will take the people of Israel from the nations among which they have gone….  Then they shall be my people, and I will be their God” (Ezekiel 37:21, 23).

You might say that these are semantic differences – word games.  You might be right, but I would suggest that these semantics are far from trivial.  It is important when talking about issues like this to be clear in our terms.

The people of Israel in the Hebrew Scriptures are indeed God’s people.  But they are more than that – they are God’s covenant people.  That word covenant is so important.  If you read Deuteronomy, you will begin to understand what it means to be a covenant people.  Covenant people have obligations.  If covenant people fail to live up to their end of the covenant, then God has no obligation to them.  A cursory reading of Deuteronomy 28 makes clear the rewards and punishments associated with covenantal obedience (or lack thereof).

To sum up: to be one of God’s people, according to the Hebrew Scriptures, was to abide by the covenant.  If a person or a group of people (such as all of the Israelites) failed to do so, they no longer had the right to consider God bound by the covenant.  This is, in fact, the story of the Hebrew Scriptures – disobedience that leads to exile.  The question, then, becomes not whether the Bible refers to the modern nation-state of Israel (it doesn’t), but whether Modern Israel can be considered as the “People of God.”

Modern Israel as the “People of God”

The main question of whether or not Modern Israel can be considered the “People of God” breaks down into two sub-questions.  The first is this: are the actions of Modern Israel consistent with the obligations entailed in being God’s people?  That is, is the nation-state of Israel acting in ways that are consistent with the covenant?

Take a look at the picture below.  It depicts the change in land “ownership” over the course of the nation-state of Israel’s history.  The legend is a bit small, so I'll tell you that the green represents land controlled by Palestinians and white represents land controlled by Israel.



The second picture from the left portrays what it is supposed to look like.  According to the UN, that is how the land is supposed to be divided between the Israeli and Palestinian populations.  Clearly, though, things haven’t stayed that way.  Using a variety of provocations (some legitimate, others less-so) as excuses, Israel has systematically (and illegally) taken land from the Palestinian people.  Israel continues to do this.  It does not take much to look at that picture and find the nation-state of Israel in violation of the covenant commands to not covet, to not steal, and to not bear false witness.  Perhaps the nation-state of Israel is not acting in concert with its covenant.

It is not just land, though.  The breaking of covenant extends to the treatment of the Palestinian people in what little land that remains to them.  Bluntly, Israel is practicing apartheid against the Palestinians.  I used to think that word too extreme, but then I looked up its literal definition: “a policy or system of segregation or discrimination on grounds of race” (via Google).  That is exactly what the Israelis are doing to the Palestinians, and it is a clear violation of the covenant described by the Hebrew Scriptures and by which the "People of God" are supposed to live.

Leviticus 19:33-34 say this: “When an alien resides with you in your land, you shall not oppress the alien.  The alien who resides with you shall be to you as the citizen among you….”  If you question whether Israel’s treatment of the Palestinian people rises to the level of oppression, I invite you to consider the information at http://www.ifamericansknew.org/cur_sit/water.html in light of Google’s definition of oppression – “prolonged cruel or unjust treatment or control.” 

Israel has illegally taken land from the Palestinians and continues to oppress the Palestinians, both of which constitute violations of the covenant by which the people of Israel are named the “People of God.”  It is not wrong, therefore, to suggest that the modern nation-state of Israel has by its actions in violation of the covenant has forfeited its right to that title.

There is a second question at play here, though, one that cuts through even the illegal and oppressive actions of Israel.  Namely this: Does ethnicity have anything at all to do with being God’s people?  That is, even if Israel’s actions were in perfect concert with the covenant described in the Hebrew Scriptures, does ethnic or genetic Jewishness equate to special favor in the eyes of God?

This question is spoken to in the Gospels and by Paul.  In Matthew 3, John the Baptist is baptizing when some Pharisees come out to see him.  Listen to what he says to them:  “Do not presume to say to yourselves, ‘We have Abraham as our ancestor’; for I tell you, God is able from these stones to raise up children to Abraham.”  It seems clear that John is telling them that their bloodlines, their family trees, are not enough – that being a “child of Abraham” entails far more than ethnic identity.

Paul makes the case even more strongly in Romans 9:6-8: “For not all Israelites truly belong to Israel, and not all of Abraham’s children are his true descendants….  This means that it is not the children of the flesh who are the children of God, but the children of the promise are counted as descendants.”  It cannot get any clearer than that.

Identity as the people of God no longer has anything to do with race: “There is no longer Jew or Greek, slave or free, male and female; for all of you are one in Christ Jesus” (Galatians 3:28).  To be one of the people of God means to worship God, to seek God’s Kingdom, and to follow Jesus Christ.  It is to recognize that God is just and to seek true justice in not just our own doings but in all the world.  Those who do these things are the “People of God,” regardless of their genetics.

When one looks again at the earlier question, “Can the modern nation-state of Israel be understood as the ‘People of God?’”, the answer does not have to be yes.  In fact, as I’ve tried to make clear, a very strong argument can be made that the answer to that question is a resounding NO!  Regardless, however, my hope is that this has at least made clear that Christian Zionism is a dangerous house of cards built on assumptions that, if not outright faulty, warrant a great deal of scrutiny.

Concluding Thoughts

This has been a ridiculously long post, to be sure, and one with a lot of information.  There are, however, some things I hope the hardy reader who has made it this far might take away from this:
  •  We need to get over Christian Zionism.  Israel can and should be held as accountable by Christians for its unjust and oppressive actions as any other nation.
  • There is no moral high ground on this issue.  This post centers on what Israel has done wrong, but I am not naïve enough to believe the Palestinian population entirely innocent.
  •   Being pro-Palestine does not make one either an inferior Christian or an anti-Semite.
  • Thoughtful Christians can disagree on causes and initiators of injustice, but we should be able to unite in prayers that justice will reign.

I close with a challenge.  Be informed!  Do not simply settle for what you see on the news – American media has historically ignored the Palestinian side of the conflict.  Take the time to read Amira Hass’ excellent book Drinking the Sea at Gaza or Muna Hamzeh’s Refugees in Our Own Land.  Both tell the story of the Palestinian people from inside the camps and settlements.  If books aren’t your things, hop on Netflix and spend a couple hours watching Five Broken Cameras or With God on Our Side.  Take a peek at www.ifamericansknew.org.

Whatever you do and however you go about it, please be informed – don’t simply repeat someone else’s thoughts or ideas.  Because when we are better informed, we will know better how to pray and how to actively seek God’s justice in Israel and Palestine.


Amen.